↓ Skip to main content

Oncotarget

Bone marrow adipocytes promote the warburg phenotype in metastatic prostate tumors via HIF-1α activation

Overview of attention for article published in Oncotarget, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Bone marrow adipocytes promote the warburg phenotype in metastatic prostate tumors via HIF-1α activation
Published in
Oncotarget, August 2016
DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.11712
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D. Diedrich, Erandi Rajagurubandara, Mackenzie K. Herroon, Gargi Mahapatra, Maik Hüttemann, Izabela Podgorski

Abstract

Metabolic adaptation is increasingly recognized as a key factor in tumor progression, yet its involvement in metastatic bone disease is not understood. Bone is as an adipocyte-rich organ, and a major site of metastasis from prostate cancer. Bone marrow adipocytes are metabolically active cells capable of shaping tumor metabolism via lipolysis and lipid transfer. In this study, using in vitro and in vivo models of marrow adiposity, we demonstrate that marrow fat cells promote Warburg phenotype in metastatic prostate cancer cells. We show increased expression of glycolytic enzymes, increased lactate production, and decreased mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in tumor cells exposed to adipocytes that require paracrine signaling between the two cell types. We also reveal that prostate cancer cells are capable of inducing adipocyte lipolysis as a postulated mechanism of sustenance. We provide evidence that adipocytes drive metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells via oxygen-independent mechanism of HIF-1α activation that can be reversed by HIF-1α downregulation. Importantly, we also demonstrate that the observed metabolic signature in tumor cells exposed to adipocytes mimics the expression patterns seen in patients with metastatic disease. Together, our data provide evidence for a functional relationship between marrow adipocytes and tumor cells in bone that has likely implications for tumor growth and survival within the metastatic niche.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,340,423
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#10,574
of 14,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,961
of 336,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#846
of 1,215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.