The role of EGFR mutations in predicting recurrence in early and locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma following definitive therapy
Oncotarget, May 2020
Carlos Galvez, Saya Jacob, Brian S. Finkelman, Jeffrey Zhao, Kyle Tegtmeyer, Young Kwang Chae, Nisha Mohindra, Ravi Salgia, Borko Jovanovic, Amir Behdad, Victoria Villaflor
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||21%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||4%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
of 14,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 394,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.