↓ Skip to main content

Oncotarget

The lncRNAs PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 are not implicated in castration resistant prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Oncotarget, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
The lncRNAs PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 are not implicated in castration resistant prostate cancer
Published in
Oncotarget, March 2014
DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.1846
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Prensner, Anirban Sahu, Matthew K. Iyer, Rohit Malik, Benjamin Chandler, Irfan A. Asangani, Anton Poliakov, Ismael A. Vergara, Mohammed Alshalalfa, Robert B. Jenkins, Elai Davicioni, Felix Y. Feng, Arul M. Chinnaiyan

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (IncRNAs) are increasingly implicated in cancer biology, contributing to essential cancer cell functions such as proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. In prostate cancer, several lncRNAs have been nominated as critical actors in disease pathogenesis. Among these, expression of PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 has been identified as a possible component in disease progression through the coordination of androgen receptor (AR) signaling (Yang et al., Nature 2013, see ref. [1]). However, concerns regarding the robustness of these findings have been suggested. Here, we sought to evaluate whether PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 are associated with prostate cancer. Through a comprehensive analysis of RNA-sequencing data (RNA-seq), we find evidence that PCGEM1 but not PRNCR1 is associated with prostate cancer. We employ a large cohort of >230 high-risk prostate cancer patients with long-term outcomes data to show that, in contrast to prior reports, neither gene is associated with poor patient outcomes. We further observe no evidence that PCGEM1 nor PRNCR1 interact with AR, and neither gene is a component of AR signaling. Thus, we conclusively demonstrate that PCGEM1 and PRNCR1 are not prognostic lncRNAs in prostate cancer and we refute suggestions that these lncRNAs interact in AR signaling.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Student > Master 9 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,355,821
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#6,642
of 14,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,662
of 223,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#62
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.