| Title |
Evaluation of cellular alterations and inflammatory profile of mesothelial cells and/or neoplastic cells exposed to talc used for pleurodesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oncotarget, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.18632/oncotarget.27750 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Milena Marques Pagliarelli Acencio, Bruna Rocha Silva, Lisete Ribeiro Teixeira, Vanessa Adélia Alvarenga, Carlos Sérgio Rocha Silva, Aline Graças Pereira da Silva, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Evaldo Marchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#813,879
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#300
of 14,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,038
of 415,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#9
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.