↓ Skip to main content

Oncotarget

Lessons from the ACDC-RP trial: Clinical trial design for radical prostatectomy neoadjuvant therapy trials

Overview of attention for article published in Oncotarget, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator
Title
Lessons from the ACDC-RP trial: Clinical trial design for radical prostatectomy neoadjuvant therapy trials
Published in
Oncotarget, September 2024
DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.28648
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rashid K. Sayyid, Neil E. Fleshner

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2024.
All research outputs
#1,265,734
of 26,741,253 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#608
of 14,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,476
of 148,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,741,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.