↓ Skip to main content

Oncotarget

Genotype matters: Personalized screening recommendations for germline CHEK2 variants

Overview of attention for article published in Oncotarget, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
Title
Genotype matters: Personalized screening recommendations for germline CHEK2 variants
Published in
Oncotarget, July 2024
DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.28604
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adela Rodriguez Hernandez, Rochelle Scheib, Judy E. Garber, Huma Q. Rana, Brittany L. Bychkovsky

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#631,247
of 26,533,029 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#222
of 14,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,902
of 287,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,533,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.